Wednesday, July 17, 2019

Gave willingly to the company Essay

In my own personal experience I erect that in Ikea thither were numerous divorcees and single people. There were also an signally high number of couples that had met through Ikea and wherefore worked together in the same building. some(prenominal) of the divorcees openly blamed their relationship break-up on the fact that they work for Ikea their partners simply did non understand the perpetration, in terms of time, that they gave willingly to the guild.My own relationship with my partner started to experience quite soon later the initial 3-month point in time, I had bonded with my newly colleagues and I was zealous and committed to this new way of on the profession(p) my attitude to work and my commitment had changed in favour of Ikea (Festinger, 1957).As a autobus it was encouraged that pillowcases should be set by giving that little bit wasted to help co-workers across the reposition, so for casing if the tills were busy at the end of the even it was an unspoke n rule that all managers should limp until closing time to help go past the backlog of customers, this sometimes meant leaving the store an hour and a half after the official end of the day.I found it difficult to go against the norm as everyone else appeared to take it for granted, I wanted to guide at my normal time of 6.00pm scarce found it impossible to do so when my colleagues were staying behind and helping out. Solomon Asch describes this type of deportment as yielding (Gross, 1996 Ch 20) conforming to free radical pressure. Festinger talks about the five conditions for increase fervour in a stamp following the disconfirmation of a belief, this is comparable to an example when a close friend of mine at Ikea (store manager) had been working hard and hence there had been some irrevocable difference of creed inside his marriage about the wrinkle and the expectations of Ikea.After his initial split with his married woman he dealt with her condemnation of Ikea by catt le farm the word of Ikea with increased enthusiasm and regenerate passion, he apothegm the Ikea family as his live network and this reliance on the company and Ikea family members simply reinforced the belief in his decision (Festinger, 1959) of ending his marriage. On a similar personal level my job and my alliance to it became an increasing problem at home. My behaviour changed at home, I do excuses about going into work primaeval and staying late.In the initial some months I found myself defending Ikea as I felt so close to my new colleagues and didnt want to let them down, til now as time went on I reliableised that I missed the lineament time with my partner and I saying that my priorities had become affected by my commitment to work. At work I saw friends splitting up with their partners because of similar reasons and and so justifying their action by criticising their relationship. This type of cogent evidence for their behaviour resembles what Festinger wrote abou t in When fortune telling Fails.Where dissonance is rationalised through the support of your blighter believers (in this case fellow co-workers). After 12 months I sustained an injury that curb to a back operation and this period away from work (3 months) gave me time to consider on my time there and started to apprehend how I had been bewitchd by the Ikea way and how I had conformed to this way incredibly fast. Conformity involves a change of behaviour or opinion in order to fit in with a group. According to Crutchfield Conformity is a yielding to group pressure when there is no direct request to honor with the group. (Gross, 1996 479). However according to Zimbardo & Leippe Conformity is a change in belief or behaviour in response to real or imagined group pressure where there is no direct request to survey with the group norm. (Gross, 1996479). Majority becharm is when a larger group influences a littler group or individual. Although Asch was generally implicated with how one can resist volume influence and pressure, his experiments are generally deemed to pose the power of majority influence.Similar to the influence of the majority found in Ikea. gratis(p) to say upon my return I resolved to leave Ikea and 3 months later I moved to another job with a different company. In the first few weeks I felt a abundant sense of great loss just about a grief my herb of graces were therefore twofold, I felt a regret of leaving the fold of Ikea and also a regret that conflicted with this and that was of not realising sooner my behavioral and attitude changes that had affected my personal life.In summing up this paper we view as looked at Ikea and how its culture was aligned to sociological groups. We devote covered the way of working within this organisation and how this relates to conformity and group influence again drawing parallels to similar sociological findings. It has been interesting journey to relate this representative where my own pe rsonal experience has been influenced by the belonging of a group, especially a group with such strong ethnical roots as Ikea.The analogies found in this paper make it more perceivable as to how social influences can have such wide-ranging affects on individuals. And how galore(postnominal) situations (from the impact of TV on the mob through to major historical events such as the rise of Nazism) can arise. It surely makes the self and our interaction with others food for thought.References(Festinger, 1957) Gross, 1996 448 cognitive dissonance theory. Gross, R. (1999). The Science of judging and Behavior. (3rd Ed). Hodder & Stoughton. Press) (Festinger, 1959)

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.